FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 1400
WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1710
TELEPHONE: 202 434-9987 / FAX: 202 434-9949
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
CRIMSON OAK GROVE RESOURCES
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
Docket No. SE 2021-0134
A.C. No. 01-00851-533786
Mine: Oak Grove Mine
ORDER CERTIFYING CASE FOR INTERLOCUTORY REVIEW
Before: Judge Young
This case is before me on a Petition for the Assessment of Civil Penalty under section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (“Mine Act”), 30 U.S.C. § 815(d). I denied a motion to approve settlement of this docket, and four similarly situated proceedings. The Secretary seeks interlocutory review of all five proceedings, pursuant to Commission Procedural Rule 76, 29 C.F.R. § 2700.76.
This docket includes five citations issued pursuant to Section 104(a) of the Mine Act. On September 28, 2021, the Secretary submitted a motion to approve settlement. The motion proposed vacating one citation, while modifying or leaving undisturbed the remaining four citations and reducing the total penalty from $29,497.00 to $11,672.00. See S. Mot. to Approve Settlement at 2 (Sept. 28, 2021).
The question certified for review and my position have been clearly expressed in the Order Certifying Case for Interlocutory Review for Docket No. WEVA 2021-0294 (Appendix C). As in each associated docket, the Secretary chose not to provide information supporting the vacatur of the contested citations or certify that vacatur was not contingent upon resolution of the remaining citations. Instead, he invoked unreviewable discretion under RBK Construction, Inc. See 15 FMSHRC 2099, 2101 (Oct. 1993) (“RBK”). I found that RBK does not control the resolution of this issue, and that the citations proposed to be vacated have been contested before the Commission and are subject to my approval. See Unpublished Order at 3 (Oct. 7, 2021) (Appendix A).
Under Commission Procedural Rule 76, 29 C.F.R. § 2700.76, I certify that this interlocutory ruling involves a controlling question of law—whether the Secretary has unreviewable discretion to vacate a contested citation without the Commission’s approval—and that immediate review will materially advance the final disposition of the proceeding.
For the reasons stated herein, and in my order certifying interlocutory review in WEVA 2021-0294, this interlocutory ruling is hereby CERTIFIED.
/s/ Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution (by email):
Emily Toler Scott, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Dep’t of Labor, Scott.Emily.T@dol.gov
Alexandra J. Gilewicz, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Dep’t of Labor, Gilewicz.Alexandra.J@dol.gov
Wm. Allen McGilton, Assistant Director of Safety-Assessments, American Consolidated Natural Resources, Inc., firstname.lastname@example.org
Appendix A: Order Denying Motion to Approve Settlement, Docket No. SE 2021-0134 (Oct. 7, 2021)
Appendix B: Order Staying Proceedings, Docket No. SE 2021-0134 (Oct. 19, 2021)
Appendix C: Order Certifying Case for Interlocutory Review, Docket No. WEVA 2021-0294 (November 19, 2021)
 The others are Docket Nos. WEVA 2021-0294, LAKE 2021-0145, YORK 2021-0023, and SE 2021-0112, all of which were similarly stayed pending certification. See Unpublished Order at 1 n.1 (Oct. 19, 2021) (Appendix B).
 “In an exercise of his prosecutorial discretion as previously recognized by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission in RBK Construction, 15 FMSHRC 2099 (October 1993), the Secretary has agreed to vacate Citation No. 9493063.” S. Mot. at 1–2.