FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
JUSTIFICATION
OF
APPROPRIATION
ESTIMATES
FOR
COMMITTEE
ON APPROPRIATIONS
FISCAL
YEAR 2011
Table
of Contents
Fiscal
Year 2011 Performance Budget and Justification
Executive Summary.................................................................................................................... 3
Functions and Procedures ........................................................................................................ 5
Strategic Goals ............................................................................................................................. 6
Organization Chart....................................................................................................................... 7
Commission Members ............................................................................................................... 8
Appropriation Language............................................................................................................. 9
Authorizing Legislation............................................................................................................... 9
Narrative Justifications ............................................................................................................. 10
����������� General
Statement
����������� Activities:
����������������������� Commission Review
����������������������� Administrative Law Judge
Determinations
����������������������� Office of the Executive
Director
Agency-wide Management Objectives ................................................................................. 21
Consultants ................................................................................................................................ 28
Charts and Graphs ................................................................................................................... 29
Budget Authority by Object Class
Personnel Summary ���������
Amounts Available for Obligation
�Summary of Changes by Budget Authority������
Appropriation History ��������
Staffing History Table
Staffing History Graph�������
Selected Workload Data ���
Graph A
�����������������������
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (�Commission�) is an
independent adjudicative agency that provides administrative trial and
appellate review of legal disputes arising under the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 (�Mine Act�), as amended.�
Section 113 of that Act establishes the Commission and sets forth its
responsibilities.� The New Emergency
Response Act of 2006, P.L. 109-236 (�MINER Act�) in June of 2006 added an
additional responsibility to the Commission, resolving disputes between the
Secretary of Labor and underground coal operators with respect to the contents
of emergency response plans or the Secretary�s refusal to approve such plans.
Most
cases that come before the Commission involve civil penalties proposed by the
Department of Labor�s Mine Safety and Health Administration (�MSHA�) against
mine operators.� The Commission is
responsible for addressing whether the alleged violations occurred as well as
the appropriateness of proposed penalties.�
Other types of cases include contests of MSHA orders to close a mine for
health or safety reasons, miners� charges of discrimination based on their
complaints regarding health or safety, and miners� requests for compensation
after being idled by a mine closure order.�
Unlike most of the cases that come before the Commission, disputes
involving the temporary reinstatement of a miner or an emergency response plan
must be decided on an expedited basis.�
The
Commission�s Administrative Law Judges (�Judges�) decide cases at the trial
level.� The 5-member Commission provides
administrative appellate review.� Review
of a Judge�s decision by the Commission is not automatic but requires the
approval of at least two Commissioners.�
Most of the cases accepted for review are generated from petitions filed
by parties adversely affected by a Judge�s decision.� In addition, the Commission, on its own
initiative, may decide to review a case.�
A Judge�s decision that is not accepted for review becomes a final,
non-precedential order of the Commission.�
Appeals from the Commission�s decisions are to the federal circuit
courts of appeals.
�
The
Commission is requesting a budget of $13,105,000 covering 77 FTEs for FY
2011.� The Commission believes that this
request level will allow it to prevent the current backlog of trial cases from
growing any further.� The request
includes $1,937,000 to support 15 additional FTEs and $810,000 to support a
base staff of 62 and to provide for an anticipated 1.4% pay increase for
January 2011.
Since
FY 2006, the number of new cases filed with the Commission has steadily
increased.� From FY 2000 through FY 2005,
the average number of cases filed was 192 per month, or 2,307 per year.� However, in FY 2008 and FY 2009, 8,961 and
9,230 new cases were filed, respectively.�
(See attached graph A showing the increase in cases received and the
increased disposition rate.)� The
Commission currently has a backlog of over 15,000 cases.� In contrast, the average backlog from FY 2000
through FY 2004 was only 1,379.� At the
current rate of increase, the projected total backlog will be over 18,000 by
the end of FY 2010.
Considering
that the backlog, as of December 31, 2009, was 15,306 (over 6 times what the
normal caseload has been from FY 1995 through FY 2005), and considering that we
have estimated that each experienced Judge supported by one dedicated law clerk
and a legal assistant whose time is shared by two judges, can dispose of
approximately 500 cases annually, the Commission has concluded that its Office
of Administrative Law Judges (�OALJ�) needs a total of 18 Judges to prevent the
backlog from growing any further.�
Additional space will be required to accommodate the necessary increase
in staff.
Only
a small fraction of cases decided by the Commission�s OALJ is appealed in any
given year.� Consequently, at the
appellate level, the workload is expected to remain relatively consistent with
200 new cases anticipated for FY 2010.�
After disposition of 190 cases, an end-of-year inventory of 105
undecided cases is expected.� In FY 2011,
we anticipate 205 new appeals resulting in an end-of-year inventory of 115
cases.
In
addition to conducting its appellate responsibilities, the Commission published
in FY 2009 an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking regarding requests to
reopen cases in which a mine operator is in default for failure to respond to
the Secretary�s proposed penalty or to a Judge�s order.� The number of these cases has increased
sharply, in part due to a significant number of operators who, due to increased
enforcement, are contesting citations, orders, and civil penalties for the
first time, and who are unfamiliar with Commission procedures.�
The
Commission has been taking a number of steps to dispose of cases more
efficiently and reduce the backlog.� In
an attempt to expedite the processing of settlement decisions, the Commission
intends to promulgate alternative filing requirements, such as the submission
of proposed decisions electronically by the parties.� For FY 2010, the Commission will increase its
full-time law clerks to 9 to assist the OALJ, which will substantially increase
the productivity of the Judges.� Under
our FY 2011 budget request, we are seeking a one-to-one ratio of law clerks to
Judges, to achieve a disposition rate per Judge of 500 cases annually.� The Commission continues to develop an
electronic case-tracking system and electronic filing system, which will reduce
processing time and improve staff productivity.�
The Commission is also considering the elimination of some procedural requirements,
and the implementation of a simplified litigation system for some cases.� Our proposed budget would allow the
Commission to go forward with these plans.�
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY
AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
The Commission is an independent adjudicatory
agency charged with resolving disputes arising from the enforcement of
occupational safety and health standards in the nation�s mines.� Under its enabling statute, the Mine Act, as
amended, the Commission does not regulate the mining industry, nor does it
enforce the Mine Act; those functions are delegated to the Secretary of Labor
acting through the Mine Safety and Health Administration (�MSHA�). The
Commission�s mission is to provide just, speedy, and articulate adjudication of
proceedings authorized under the Mine Act, thereby enhancing compliance with
the Act and contributing to the improved health and safety of the nation�s
miners.
The scope of the Commission�s mission has
been significantly expanded by the passage of the Mine Improvement and the
MINER Act.� That statute amends the Mine
Act and vests the Commission with the responsibility for resolving disputes
over the contents of mine emergency plans adopted by underground coal mine
operators and submitted to MSHA for review and approval.� The MINER Act imposes tight deadlines on the
Commission and its Judges with respect to these proceedings, and the Commission
has expeditiously adopted procedural rules for carrying out Congressional
intent.� The statute calls for the
periodic updating, review, and approval of mine emergency plans and the
adoption of new technologies in underground communications and disaster
response.� As this process evolves, the
Commission anticipates that its role as arbiter in the plan adoption and
approval process will be a significant and ongoing responsibility.
FUNCTIONS AND
PROCEDURES
The Commission carries out its
responsibilities through trial-level adjudication by Judges and appellate
review of Judge�s decisions by a 5-member Commission appointed by the President
and confirmed by the Senate.� Most cases
involve civil penalties assessed against mine operators by MSHA and address
whether the alleged safety and health violations occurred, and, if so, the
degree of gravity and negligence involved, so that in the appropriate sanctions
can be imposed.� Other types of cases
involve mine operators� contests of mine closure orders, miners� complaints of
safety or health related discrimination, miners� applications for compensation
after a mine is idled by a closure order, and review of disputes between MSHA
and underground coal mine operators relating to those operators� mine emergency
plans.
Once a case is filed with the Commission, it
is given a docket number and referred to the Chief Administrative Law Judge (�Chief
Judge�).� Thereafter, litigants in the
case must submit additional filings before the case is assigned to a Judge.� To expedite the decisional process, the Chief
Judge may rule on certain motions and, where appropriate, issue orders of
settlement, dismissal, or default.�
Otherwise, once a case is assigned to an individual Judge, that judge is
responsible for the case and rules upon motions and settlement proposals,
schedules the case for hearing, holds the hearing, and issues a decision based
upon the record.� A Judge�s decision that
is not reviewed becomes a final, non-precedential order of the Commission.
The 5-member Commission provides
administrative appellate review based on the record. It may, in its discretion,
review decisions issued by Judges when requested by a litigant, or it may, on
its own initiative, direct cases for review.�
The Commission�s decisions are precedential and appeals from the
Commission�s decisions are heard in the Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals.
STRATEGIC GOAL
The Commission has set forth the following
strategic goals: 1) to ensure expeditious, fair, and legally sound adjudication
of cases at the trial and appellate levels, and��������� 2) manage the Commission�s human
resources, operations, facilities, and Information Technology (�IT�) systems to
ensure a continually improving, effective, and efficient organization.
�����������������������
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW
COMMISSION
Commission Members
NAME����������������������������������������������������������� TERM
EXPIRATION
Mary Lu Jordan,
Chairman����������������������� August 30,
2014
Michael F. Duffy����������������������������������������� August
30, 2012
Michael G. Young��������������������������������������� August
30, 2014
Robert F. Cohen, Jr.����������������������������������� August 30,
2012
*****
�����������������������������������������������������������������������
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY
AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
For necessary expenses of the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Review Commission (30 U.S.C. 801, et. Seq.) $13,105,000.
AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������� FY
2010�������������������� FY 2011
Authorizing
Legislation
Containing
Indefinite Authority
Federal
Mine Safety and Health
Amendments
Act of 1977, as amended
(30
U.S.C. 823-824)������������������������������������������������ 10,358,000��������������� 13,105,000
JUSTIFICATION BY
ORGANIZATIONAL FUNCTION
GENERAL
STATEMENT
The Commission was
established as an independent agency by Section 113(a) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977, as amended.�
It is not part of the Department of Labor or its MSHA.
The Commission is
charged with the responsibility of reviewing the enforcement activities of the
Secretary of Labor, including hearing miners� complaints challenging unlawful
health or safety-related discrimination, and resolving compensation issues for
miners idled due to mine closure orders issued by MSHA.� The Commission also resolves disputes between
the Secretary and underground coal mine operators relating to the contents of
mine emergency plans. The Commission�s Judges hear and decide cases at the
trial level initiated by the Secretary of Labor, mine operators, miners, and miners�
representatives.� The Office of the
Executive Director (OED) supports both the Commission and Judge functions by
providing administrative and technical services to allow the Commission to
fulfill its mission and meet specific goals outlined in the Commission�s
strategic plan.
The 5-member Commission hears appeals from Judge
decisions.� The Commission may review
these decisions by granting a petition for discretionary review from one or
more of the parties or by directing review on its own motion.
FTE
by Function and Funding (in millions)
����������������������������������������������������������� FY 2010 Estimate�������� ����������� FY
2011 Request ��������������������
����������������������������������������������� ����������� FTE����� AMOUNT��������������������� FTE����� AMOUNT
Commission������������������������������������ 22*����� 5,205,000����������������� 24������� 5,700,000
Administrative Law Judges����������������������� 40������� 5,153,000����������������� 53������� 7,405,000
����������������������� Total�������������������������� 62������� 10,358,000��������������� 77����
13,105,000
�� �����������
*(5) Docket FTE moved from the Commission function to the
Administrative Law Judges function.�
The FY 2011 Budget Appendix incorrectly listed 60 FTE,
rather than 62 FTE, for FY 2010.�
Commission Review Function
The responsibility
for the review of Judge decisions is set forth in section 113(d)(1) of the
Act.� The Act states that a Judge�s
decision shall become final 40 days after its issuance, unless within that
period any two Commissioners direct that the decision be reviewed.
Most cases come
before the Commission when two or more Commissioners vote to grant a petition
for discretionary review filed by a party adversely affected or aggrieved by
the Judge�s decision.� Petitioners may
include miners, miners� representatives, mine operators or the Secretary of
Labor.� The Commission is also charged
with the responsibility of reviewing disputes arising over the emergency
response plans of underground coal operators pursuant to the MINER Act.
Two or more
Commissioners may also direct any case for review sua sponte (on the
Commission�s own motion, without the parties filing a petition).� Sua sponte review is limited to Judge
decisions that are contrary to law or Commission policy, or that present a
novel question of policy.� By law, a
quorum of three Commissioners is required to consider and decide cases appealed
from the Commission�s Judges.� Many of
the Commission�s cases present issues of first impression under the Mine
Act.� That is, the cases raise issues
that have not been resolved by prior decisions of the Commission or the courts
or the cases involve the interpretation of safety and health standards and
regulations newly promulgated by MSHA.
In FY 2011, it is
expected that 105 cases will be pending for review by the Commission at the
beginning of the year. �A total of 205
new cases are anticipated for review by the Commission during FY 2011.� One hundred ninety-five dispositions are
expected, resulting in an end-of-year inventory of 115 undecided cases.
In FY 2010, the
Commission began the year with an inventory of 95 undecided cases, and 200 new
cases are anticipated for the year.� One
hundred ninety cases are expected to be decided, resulting in a docket of 105
undecided cases at the end of the fiscal year.
The Commission began
FY 2009 with an inventory of 103 undecided cases and received 184 new cases
during the year.� One hundred ninety-two
dispositions were made during FY 2009, resulting in 95 undecided cases
remaining at the end of the fiscal year.
Of the 192 cases
decided in FY 2009, 4 were substantive decisions, 184 were procedural orders in
default cases and 4 were denials of petitions for review.� The average age of the 95 default cases
pending on the Commission�s docket as of September 1, 2009 was 4.1 months, and
the average age of the 4 substantive decisions issued in FY 2009 was 9.6
months.
During FY 2009, the
number of default cases handled by the Commission continued to be a major
challenge, particularly for the Commission�s Office of the General Counsel (�OGC�).� Default cases typically involve situations
where a mine operator has allegedly failed to challenge civil penalties
proposed by the MSHA within the prescribed 30-day period for contesting such
proposed penalties.� Under the Mine Act,
proposed penalties that are not timely contested automatically become final
Commission orders.� Operators may file
written requests with the Commission seeking to establish �good cause� to
re-open the final orders.� The Commission
has determined that operators may file requests seeking to establish good cause
to re-open final orders utilizing principles adopted by the Federal Courts.
The number of default
cases received by the Commission increased from 68 in FY 2007 to 177 in FY 2008
- a 2.5 fold increase.� That higher rate
continued in FY 2009 as 170 default cases were received.� The increase in default orders has greatly
increased the demands on OGC�s attorneys, who must analyze each case and
prepare a draft order for the Commissioners.
Commission
Review Caseload Data
����������������������������������������������������������������������������� FY
2009�������� FY 2010�������� FY 2011
����������������������������������������������������������������������������� Actual������������ Estimate ������ Estimate
Cases
pending beginning of year����������������� 103���������������� 95������������������� 105
New
cases received����������������������������������������� 184���������������� 200���������������� 205
Total
case workload������������������������������������������ 287���������������� 295���������������� 310
Cases
decided�������������������������������������������������� 192���������������� 190���������������� 195
Cases
pending end of year���������������������������� � 95����������������� 105���������������� 115
Commission Review Staffing
The
Commission is requesting a budget of $5,500,000 and 24 FTE for its appellate
review activities in FY 2011.� The
following FTEs are included:� 10 FTEs for
the five Commissioners and their immediate staff, 6 FTEs for OGC, and 8 FTEs
for the Office of the Executive Director (�OED).� This is an increase of $370,000 over the
amount estimated to be available for FY 2010.�
The request includes funding of a projected 1.4% pay increase in January
2011, and other costs of Commission operations.
The
FY 2010 resource level for the Commission Review activity is expected to be
$5,130,000 with actual employment of 22 FTEs.�
The
FY 2009 resource level for the Commission Review Activity was $4,919,400 and 26
FTEs.
|
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
Increase or Decrease |
||||
|
FTE |
Amount |
FTE |
Amount |
FTE |
Amount |
FTE |
Amount |
Commission Review, Total Budget
Authority |
26** |
4,919,400 |
*22 |
5,130,000 |
24 |
5,500,000 |
+2 |
+370,000 |
*� (5) Docket FTEs moved from the Commission
function to the Administrative Law Judge function in FY 2010.
** FY 2009 FTE represent the
FTE ceiling given budget authority, not actual FTE.�
Performance Objective and Goals for FY 2011:
The Commission�s FY
2011 budget includes the following objective and goals for its appellate function:
Objective:� Issue opinions in a timely manner.�
Performance Goals for
FY 2011:
�
All
Commission cases will be assigned before briefing is completed.
�
All
remaining Commission cases will be decided within 18 months of receipt.
�
The
average age of substantive decisions will be maintained at 12 months or
less.
Performance
Objective, Goals, and Accomplishments for FY 2009:
The Commission
developed the following performance objectives associated with its
FY 2009 budget.� The objectives and accomplishments achieved
during the year were:
�Objective 1 � Issue opinions in a timely
manner
Performance Goals for
FY 2009:
�
All
Commission cases will be assigned when briefing is completed.
�����������
Accomplishments:� This goal was met.� All cases were assigned before briefing was completed.����������������� ����������� �����������������������������������������������������
�
The
Commission will have decided all cases that are 18 months or older.
Accomplishments:� This goal was met.� On September 30, 2009 no case that was 18
months or older was pending before the Commission.
�
The
average age of substantive decisions will be maintained at 12 months or
���� less.�����
��
Accomplishments:� This goal was met.� On September 30, 2009, the average age of the
substantive dispositions was 9.6 months.
Performance
Measurement Matrix
Commission
Review
�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
|
|
FY 2005 |
FY 2006 |
FY 2007 |
FY 2008 |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
Actual |
Actual |
Actual |
Actual |
Goal |
Actual |
Goal |
Goal |
||
|
Objective:� Issue opinions in a timely manner |
||||||||
|
Undecided
cases over 24 months of age |
0 |
0 |
0 |
����������� 0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
����������� 0 |
▲ |
Undecided
cases over 18 months of age (inclusive) |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Undecided
cases over 12 months of age (inclusive) |
4 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
▲ |
Cases
briefed but unassigned |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
▲ |
Substantive
disposition age |
13.1 |
15.5 |
5.1 |
8.9 |
12.0 |
9.6 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
▲� Current performance goals or quality indicators
Administrative
Law Judge Function
The Commission employs Administrative Law
Judges to hear and decide contested cases at the trial level, as initiated by
the Secretary of Labor, mine operators, and miners or their representatives.� The judges are also responsible for
evaluating and approving or denying settlement agreements under the Mine Act.
The Judges travel to hearing sites located at
or near the mine involved in order to afford mine operators, miners and their
representatives full opportunity to participate in the hearing process.�
In FY 2011, the Commission expects that
18,247 cases will be pending at the beginning of the year.� A total of 9,200 new cases are anticipated,
with 7,750 projected dispositions occurring during the year.� The Commission estimates an end-of-year
inventory of 19,697 undecided cases.
The Commission believes that the number of
new case filings will not decrease in FY 2011 as operators continue to elect to
contest higher civil penalties proposed by MSHA and as MSHA increases its
utilization of its �pattern of significant and substantial violations�
sanctions.
In FY 2010, the Commission began the year
with an inventory of 14,213 undecided trial cases, and 9,200 cases are
anticipated for the year.� A total of
5,166 cases are expected to be decided, resulting in an end-of-fiscal-year
inventory of 18,247 undecided cases.
The Commission�s OALJs began FY 2009 with an
inventory of 9,737 cases, with 9,239 new cases received during the year.� Case dispositions for the year were 4,766,
resulting in an end-of-year inventory of 14,213 undecided trial cases.� The number of new trial cases received
represents a 400% increase over FY 2005; cases were filed with the Commission
at a faster rate than experienced at any time in the past 10 years. The Judges
in FY 2009 decided 92% of cases within 365 days.
The Commission monitors its workload by
Dockets.� Each Docket contains one or
more citations, and each citation is, in essence, a separate case for which a
Judge render a decision.� Prior to
February 2009, Dockets were limited to 20 citations due to MSHA�s
practices.� However, since MSHA has
removed that limit, Dockets may now include all citations related to a
particular inspection.� Therefore, the
number of citations in one Docket could range from one to a few hundred.� Approximately 10% of our Dockets were affected by the removal of
the 20 citation limit.
Performance Objective and Goals for FY 2011:
The Commission�s FY 2011 budget includes the
following objectives and goals for its trial function:
Objective:�
Issue opinions in a timely manner.
Performance Goals for FY 2011:
�
Manage
case assignment to ensure an expeditious process.� In FY 2010, the Commission began the year
with an inventory of 14,213 undecided trial cases, and 9,200 new cases are
anticipated for the year.
�
Assign
penalty cases in an average of 75 days.
�
Assign
review cases in an average of 30 days.
�
Assign
ALL cases in an average of 60 days.
�
Issue
85% of decisions within 180 days of receipt of post-hearing briefs.�
�
Issue
85% of settlement approvals within 60 days of receipt of settlement motion.
�
Decide
all cases within an average of 16 months from date of assignment.
�
Decide
all cases within an average of 18 months from date of receipt by the
Commission.
�
Decide
90% of cases within 365 days of assignment.
�
Have
an inventory of no more than 13,000 undecided cases over 365 days from date of
assignment.
Performance
Objective, Goals, and Accomplishments for FY 2009:
The Commission developed the following
performance objectives associated with its FY 2009 budget.� The objectives and accomplishments achieved
during the year were:
Objective 1 � Issue opinions in a timely
manner
Performance Goals for FY
2009:
�
Manage the case assignment process to assure
that the initial filings and response time frames, in the Commission�s
Procedural Rules, are adhered to, resulting in the expeditious assignment of
cases.������
����� Accomplishments:�� The average time for cases
to be assigned to a Judge was 214 days.�
Penalty cases were assigned within 266 days, on average, in FY 2009, due
in part to delays in receiving assessments from DOL and insufficient clerical
staff in the Docket Office.��
‚
Issue
90 percent of decisions involving hearings within 180 days of receipt of
post-hearing briefs.
�
����� Accomplishments:
�This goal was not achieved in FY
2009 due to the increase in the caseload of each Judge, combined with a large
volume of cases requiring decisions within overlapping 180-day periods.
♦��� Issue 90
percent of settlement dispositions within 60 days of receipt of settlement
motion.
����������������������� Accomplishments:
Due to a significant increase in caseload; the Commission did not meet this
goal in FY 2009.
♦��� Decide
90 percent of cases within 15 months of assignment.
Accomplishments: The
Judges decided 92% of cases within 15 months of assignment, exceeding its
goal.� We accomplished this goal by
utilizing unpaid law student interns during the summer months; however, the
Commission cannot always rely upon unpaid interns.
�♦��� Decide
all cases within an average of 365 days from receipt by the Commission.�
������ Accomplishments:
The Judges decided all cases within an average of 319 days of receipt,
exceeding our goal.� Again, the
Commission was able to accomplish this goal by utilizing unpaid law student
interns during the summer months; however, the Commission cannot always rely
upon unpaid interns.
Performance
Measurement Matrix
Office of
Administrative Law Judges
|
|
FY 2005 |
FY2006 |
FY2 007 |
FY 2008 |
FY2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY2011 |
|
Actual |
Actual |
Actual |
Actual |
Goal |
Actual |
Goal |
Goal |
||
|
Objective 1:� Issue opinions in a timely manner |
|
|
|
|||||
▲ |
Average time (days) for assignment of
penalty cases |
73 |
78 |
89 |
135 |
81 |
266 |
95 |
75 |
▲ |
Average time (days) for assignment of
review cases |
27 |
24 |
29 |
82 |
35 |
87 |
40 |
30 |
|
Average time (days) for� assignment of all cases |
61 |
53 |
65 |
123 |
70 |
214 |
80 |
60 |
▲ |
Percentage of decisions issued within 180
days of post-hearing brief |
96% |
88% |
69% |
60% |
90% |
86% |
65% |
85% |
▲ |
Percentage of settlement approvals issued
within 60 days of settlement motion |
90% |
96% |
80% |
73% |
90% |
61% |
65% |
85% |
|
Average time (months), case assignment to
disposition |
62
days |
62
days |
63
days |
164
days |
15 |
3.5
|
21 |
16 |
▲ |
Average time (months), case receipt to
disposition |
121
days |
N/A |
128
days |
291
days |
12 |
10.5 |
24 |
18 |
▲ |
Percentage of cases decided within 365 days
of assignment |
97% |
98% |
97% |
79% |
90% |
92% |
70% |
90% |
|
Undecided cases over 365 days of age |
18 |
5 |
71 |
687 |
0 |
3738 |
11,500 |
13,000 |
Information on performance measurement is currently not available.
Office
of the Administrative Law Judge Staffing
The
Commission began FY 2010 with a case backlog of 14,213.� This is a result of a four-fold increase in
case filings since the passage of the MINER Act in 2006.� With approximately 9,200 incoming cases
annually, the Commission requests funding to expand the number of Judges and
support staff to allow it to meet workload demands.
The
Commission is requesting a budget of $7,605,000 and 53 FTEs for its Judges
determination in FY 2011.� The additional
staff increase includes 4 Judges and 9 law clerks.� This is an increase of $2,367,000 over the
amount available for FY 2010.� The
request includes funding of a projected 1.4% pay increase in January 2011, and
other costs of Commission operations.
Due
to an anticipated increase in staffing levels within the Office of
Administrative Law Judges, an additional office may be opened in the Washington
Metropolitan area.
The
FY 2010 resource level for the OALJs Determination Activity is expected to be
$5,238,000 and 40 FTEs.
The
FY 2009 resource level for the OALJs Determination Activity was $3,733,600 and
24 FTEs.
|
FY
2009 |
FY
2010 |
FY
2011 |
Increase
or Decrease |
||||
FTE |
Amount |
FTE |
Amount |
FTE |
Amount |
FTE |
Amount |
|
Office of the Administrative Law
Judges Determination |
24** |
3,733,600 |
*40 |
5,238,000 |
53 |
7,605,000 |
+13 |
2,367,000 |
���������������
*�� (5) Docket FTEs moved to OALJ from
Commission function in FY 2010.
**� FY 2009 FTE represent the FTE ceiling given
budget authority, not actual FTE.
Office
of the Executive Director Function
The OED provides administrative services to support the
Commission in fulfilling its mission and strategic goals.� The primary functions are budget and
accounting, human resources, procurement, information technology, facilities
management, and general administrative service support.� The following functions and support services
are provided:
The
Financial Management Services aspect of the department includes the areas of
budget and accounting, with subsections that cover budget formulation, budget
execution, funds control, financial reporting, and vendor payments.
Human
Resources covers the areas of recruitment and placement, classification and pay
administration, performance management and incentive awards, employee benefits
and retirement, personnel security, and wellness and employee assistance
programs.
Procurement
and Contracting, another vital function of OED, covers specifics such as
maintaining a simplified acquisition program for supplies and services, contract
implementation and oversight, and coordination of services and supplies.
Information
Technology, which falls under the banner of this department, entails: help desk
functions, network administration, policy formulation for IT, and
telecommunication.
The
Facilities Management covers property and space management, organization
management, and physical security.
Travel
Services involves the processing of reimbursements to employees in conjunction
with the Bureau of Public Debt (�BPD�).
The
department handles the Metro Subsidy functions, which include the distribution
of the subsidy, the maintenance of the records of certification, and the
reconciliation of all account activities.
Integral
to the professional development of the employees of the Commission is the
aspect of Training Coordination.� This
includes maintenance of current and appropriate training information, provision
of the information, and coordinating the Commission�s training program.
�Agency-wide Accomplishments
Management Objectives
The
Commission�s management goal is to manage its human resources, operations,
facilities, and systems to ensure a continually improving, effective and
efficient organization.� The objectives
of this goal, as they relate to the fiscal years covered by the FY 2011 budget
submission are as follows:
Objective
1 � Ensure Organizational and Management Effectiveness
Performance
Goals:
♦��������� Provide efficient and effective
administrative management and support services.
����������� The Commission obtains many of the
services required as an independent
agency from other
Federal agencies.� The Commission�s
payroll function is provided by the Department of Agriculture.� Personnel and accounting services website
hosting are contracted through BPD.�
These franchise agencies also perform similar services to other
government organizations thus providing the Commission with economies that
could not be independently achieved.� A
further advantage is that the Commission receives the benefit of system
enhancements required by new laws and can more effectively participate in the
President�s Management Agenda.
�����������
The Commission has
initiated a SWAT team consisting of Executives and Administrative staffing to
work together in restructuring the hiring practices of the Commission to meet
the new Office of Personnel Management (�OPM�) initiatives.� This was accomplished by preparing an end-to-end
roadmap of the Commission�s hiring policies and restructuring job announcements
used for advertising vacancies.�
Commission identification badges have been transitioned to the HSPD-12.
The Accountability of
Tax Dollars Act requires that the Commission�s financial statements be audited
annually.� The Commission utilized audit
specifications and negotiated audit contracts developed by BPD.� The audit of the Commission�s FY 2011
financial records has been completed and the Commission has again received a
�clean� audit report.
The Commission
implemented the PRISM procurement system in FY 2009 in order to streamline the
procurement process and strengthen the Commission�s internal controls.
The Commission
decreased the size of the Library to better utilize space, allowing the
Commission to hire contractors to provide support in assisting with the
backlog.� The regional office of Administrative
Law Judges was also relocated to downtown Denver from its previous location.
The Commission�s
Updated Emergency Evacuation Procedures were distributed to all current and new
employees, as well as to contractors and volunteers.� These procedures include emergency and
shelter-in-place evacuation.� A lead
monitor and an alternate monitor are assigned to each floor the Commission
occupies in a GSA-leased building.�
Evacuation drills were performed with GSA-leased building management so
employees effectively prepare for an emergency requiring an evacuation.� In addition, the Commission's emergency floor
monitors conduct independent evacuation drills twice a year to ensure that
evacuation procedures in place conform to building management procedures.� New employees and contractors are briefed on
these procedures to familiarize them with evacuation procedures.� Due to the small size of the Commission, this
function has been absorbed under OED and safety officers have been designated.
Designated Commission employees have participated in health and safety support
activities, and conferences, and have received professional certification.
The Commission is developing
an Occupational Safety and Health Policy that will require annual mandatory
training for all employees.� This policy
includes performance measures tracking annual mandatory safety and health
training for all employees, as well as the posting of safety and health posters
in Commission headquarters and the regional office.�
During the 2009
fiscal year, the Commission received 45 FOIA requests.� The majority of these requests were for
case-related materials.� Where the Commission
was in possession of documents and information that was responsive to the FOIA
request, the Commission granted the request and provided the information within
the 20-day statutory time period.� For
five requests, the Commission did not possess records responsive to the request
made.� No requests were denied in part or
in whole.� The Commission collected
$64.30 in fees.
The Commission has a
Chief FOIA Officer and a FOIA Liaison who administer its FOIA program.� During FY 2009, both employees expended on
average 5% of their work time administering the Commission�s FOIA program.� Other agency employees participated in
responding to certain FOIA requests, on an as-needed basis.� Overall, in FY 2009, the FOIA program
involved approximately 1 - 2% of the Commission�s overall work load and cost
approximately $12,000 in expenses, including personnel time.
♦��������� Evaluate Program Effectiveness.
The Commission will
continue to review its Strategic Plan to assure that its resources effectively
address its statutory requirements and constituent needs.
Performance plans are
evaluated annually to assure that goals and objectives fairly and accurately report
accomplishments.� The Commission goals
and objectives are included in individual performance standards upon which
employees are evaluated.� Interaction
during evaluations provides an excellent method to further improve performance
and gain greater efficiency.
Objective
2 � Provide Effective Information Technology Systems
Performance
Goals:
♦��������� Maintain and enhance secure electronic
information systems for case management, legal research, management operations
support, and public access of data through the Internet.
����������� The Commission has one staff member
dedicated on a full-time basis to IT and operation of its network.
����������� The Commission continues to devote a
major portion of its IT efforts to network security with the constant threat
from hackers, spammers, and viruses.�
Upgraded security software and patches were installed as they were
released.� Anti-virus scans are conducted
daily on servers and individual workstations.�
Those security efforts will continue throughout fiscal years 2010 and
2011.
The Commission
recognizes the importance of providing optimal protection for all areas
relating to IT, a vital aspect of the Commission�s operations.� It has therefore, taken all steps to protect
this valuable resource and continues to devote
a major portion of its IT efforts to network security with the constant threat
from hackers, spammers, and viruses.�
Upgraded security software and patches were installed as they were
released, in compliance with the NIST guidelines.� Anti-virus scans are conducted daily on
servers and individual workstations.�
Those security efforts will continue throughout fiscal years 2010 and
2011.
The Commission�s
website, http://www.fmshrc.gov recorded 359,856 visits
as of December 31, 2009. The website includes information about the Commission,
its rules, guides and publications, strategic and performance plans, budget
requests and justifications, performance and accountability reports, GILS
records, a database of Commission and Judge published decisions, transcripts of
oral arguments, and links to related agencies and legal materials, including
the Mine Act and MSHA.� Constituents are
promptly informed of Judge and Commission decisions through prompt posting on
the Commission�s website and can listen to audio recordings of Commission
meetings and oral arguments.
The Commission
continues to evaluate its docketing and case tracking system for both trial and
appellate activities.� The current case
tracking system continues to be developed to meet the Commission�s docket
processing needs.� Future enhancements
will be implemented within the system to support electronic filing.�
The Commission is
also currently evaluating the technical capabilities of other contractors
interested in updating the existing case tracking system.
Objective
3 � Sustain a High Performing Workforce
Performance
Goals:
♦��������� Recruit, train, and retain a diverse
workforce of skilled, highly motivated employees to effectively and efficiently
accomplish the Commission�s mission.
����������� The Commission continues to enhance
its clerkship program by hiring additional law clerks.� The clerkship program has proven to be
effective and has increased productivity.
����������� The Commission evaluated all vacant
positions to assure that any added staff represents the best use of the
Commission�s limited FTE resources and can be fully funded within available
resources.� During FY 2009 5 of the 7
priority vacancies were filled.� The 2
remaining positions, a Commissioner and Counsel are being held in abeyance
pending confirmation of the President�s nominee, Patrick K. Nakamura.� During FY 2009, 37 employees and contractors
successfully completed training programs to support their career development.
The
Commission�s Equal Employment Opportunity (�EEO�) Office directs and manages a
comprehensive EEO program assuring compliance with all Federal
anti-discrimination laws and regulations. It provides policy and legal
guidance to the Chairman and other senior level managers, ensuring that the
agency is kept abreast of all critical developments in the law. The EEO
office oversees the EEO counseling, alternative dispute resolution and
complaint procedures. It develops, manages and implements the agency�s
EEO policies and procedures. The office coordinates and conducts the
required EEO agency-wide trainings for all personnel. The EEO office
prepares and submits agency reports in compliance with the statutory and Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (�EEOC�) reporting requirements (e.g., the
Congressional submission under the No FEAR Act, EEOC Management Directive 715,
and the Annual Federal EEO Statistical Report of Discrimination
Complaints). It works with senior managers to promote equal opportunity
in recruitment, training, benefits, and promotion.
During FY
2009, the EEO Office incurred a number of expenses as part of its
mission. It purchased on-line training for all personnel to review the
requirements of the No FEAR Act. This is a requirement for all new
personnel and agency-wide every two years. The office also hired two contract
counselors to meet with agency employees and one mediator to resolve a formal
complaint. The agency also prepared a Final Agency Decision in one case.
In order to keep current with the EEO law and requirements, the EEO Director
attends training courses and EEO Director meetings. The office plans to
continue its annual trainings in the EEO field so as to proactively prevent
discrimination and to raise the awareness of employees and managers as to their
rights and remedies.
The Commission has
implemented a new system of providing annual ethics training to its
employees.� Previously, the Commission
typically presented one hour of ethics training through a general overview to
employees who were required to receive annual ethics training under 5 C.F.R. ��
2638.704 and 2638.705.� During FY 2009,
Commission employees received ethics training on-line at a website managed by
BPD.�
The training
addresses a variety of ethics-related subjects relevant to Commission
employees.� For each subject, the
Commission�s ethics officials drafted background material and questions and
answers that specifically relate to issues likely to be faced by Commission
employees.� Employees read the material,
answered the questions, and read further information provided in the
answers.� An automatic certificate of
completion is then generated for record-keeping purposes.�
The new ethics
training method has affected a number of positive changes. �First, the Commission now provides training
more often and as the specific need arises.�
For FY 2009, the Commission employees were involved in three training
sessions.� In addition, the Commission
has been able to involve a greater spectrum of employees in training, rather
than only those employees required to receive annual training.� The Commission also has been able to tailor
training to current matters at issue.�
Finally, the Commission�s ethics officials have noticed a heightened
awareness in employees regarding their ethical obligations.
�
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
Consultants
The Commission employed no consultants in FY 2009 and has
no plans to employ consultants in FY 2010 or FY 2011.
CHARTS AND GRAPHS
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW
COMMISSION
Budget Authority by Object Class
(in millions)
|
FY 2009 Actual |
FY2010 Estimate |
FY2011 Estimate |
|
|||
Personnel Compensation |
4,729 |
5,807 |
7,900 |
Other than Full-Time Permanent |
322 |
333 |
360 |
Total, Personnel Compensation |
5,051 |
6,140 |
8,260 |
Personnel Benefits, Civilian |
1,173 |
1,400 |
1,605 |
Benefits to Former Employees |
- |
- |
- |
Travel and Transportation of Persons |
147 |
175 |
230 |
Transportation of Things |
2 |
3 |
5 |
Rental Payments to GSA |
1,290 |
1,385 |
1,600 |
Communications, Utilities, and Misc. |
115 |
145 |
150 |
Printing and Reproduction |
18 |
28 |
30 |
Other Services |
707 |
840 |
940 |
Supplies and Materials |
80 |
102 |
115 |
Equipment |
70 |
140 |
170 |
Total |
8,653 |
10,358 |
13,105 |
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY
AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
Personnel Summary
|
2009 ACTUAL |
2010 ESTIMATE |
2011 REQUEST |
Account:
Salaries & Expenses |
|||
Executive
Level III Executive
Level IV |
1 3 |
1 4 |
1 4 |
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Subtotal |
4 |
5 |
5 |
ES |
1 |
1 |
1 |
AL-2 AL-3 |
1 9 |
1 13 |
1 17 |
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Subtotal |
11 |
15 |
19 |
GS-15 GS-14 GS-13 GS-12 GS-11 GS-9 GS-8 GS-7 GS-6 GS-5 GS-4 |
4 3 1 1 8 4 7 - 1 - 1 |
6 4 1 5 10 4 6 4 1 1 - |
6 4 1 5 �20 5 6 4 2 - - |
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Subtotal |
29 |
42 |
53 |
Total Permanent
Full-time Positions |
50 |
62 |
77 |
Unfilled
positions end-of-year |
�5 |
� |
� |
Total,
full-time permanent employment end-of-year |
45 |
62 |
77 |
Full-time
equivalent (FTE) usage |
50 |
62 |
77 |
____________________________________________________________________
���������������
Average EX Salary Average ES salary Average AL salary Average GS salary |
$155,625 $156,673 $161,307 $79,534 |
$158,738 $159,806 $164,533 $81,125 |
$161,913 $163,002 $167,823 $82,748 |
�����������������������������������������������������������������������������
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
Salaries and Expenses
Amounts Available for Obligation
|
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|||
|
FTE |
Amount |
FTE |
Amount |
FTE |
Amount |
Appropriation,
total estimated
obligations |
43[1] |
8,653,000 |
62 |
10,358,000 |
� 77 |
13,105,000 |
�����������
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
Summary of Changes By Budget Authority
Budget Authority |
FY 2010 |
FY2011 |
Net Change |
Appropriations |
10,358,000 |
13,105,000 |
2,747,000 |
Full-time Equivalent |
62 |
77 |
+15 |
Explanation of Changes |
FTE |
Budget Authority |
Increases |
|
1,937,000 |
Increased FTE |
+15 |
|
Maintain Base Staff |
- |
810,000 |
Decreases |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change |
+15 |
2,747,000 |
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
APPROPRIATIONS
HISTORY
Fiscal�������������������� Budget
Estimate��������������� House������������������� Senate
Year���������������������� to
Congress������������������������ Allowance����������� Allowance����������� Appropriation
1986���������������������� 3,709,000����������������������������� 3,815,000������������� 3,815,000������������� 3,651,000[2]
1987���������������������� 3,919,000����������������������������� 3,651,000������������� 3,919,000������������� 3,785,000
1988���������������������� 4,139,000����������������������������� 4,080,000������������� 4,080,000������������� 3,892,000[3]
1989���������������������� 4,079,000����������������������������� 4,079,000������������� 4,079,000������������� 4,030,000[4]
1990���������������������� 4,005,000����������������������������� 4,030,000������������� 4,030,000������������� 4,030,000
1991���������������������� 4,292,000����������������������������� 4,292,000������������� 4,292,000������������� 4,188,509[5]
1992���������������������� 4,719,000����������������������������� 4,357,000������������� 4,357,000������������� 5,143,000
1993���������������������� 5,830,000����������������������������� 5,772,000������������� 5,772,000������������� 5,726,000[6]
1994���������������������� 5,842,000����������������������������� 5,842,000������������� 5,842,000������������� 5,842,000
1995���������������������� 6,237,000����������������������������� 6,200,000������������� 6,200,000������������� 6,189,000[7]
1996���������������������� 6,467,000����������������������������� 6,467,000������������� 6,200,000������������� 6,184,000[8]
1997���������������������� 6,332,000����������������������������� 6,060,000������������� 6,060,000������������� 6,049,000[9]
1998���������������������� 6,060,000����������������������������� 6,060,000������������� 6,060,000������������� 6,060,000
1999���������������������� 6,060,000����������������������������� 6,060,000������������� 6,060,000������������� 6,060,000
2000���������������������� 6,159,000����������������������������� 6,060,000������������� 6,159,000������������� 6,136,000[10]
2001���������������������� 6,320,000����������������������������� 6,200,000������������� 6,320,000������������� 6,320,000
2002���������������������� 6,939,000����������������������������� 6,939,000������������� 6,939,000������������� 6,934,000[11]
2003���������������������� 7,127,000������������� ������ ������������������������ �
������������ �������� ��������������������� 7,131,343[12]
2004���������������������� 7,774,000����������������������������� 7,774,000������������� 7,774,000������������� 7,728,133[13]
2005���������������������� 7,813,000����������������������������� 7,813,000������������� 7,813,000������������� 7,809,024[14]
2006���������������������� 7,809,000����������������������������� 7,809,000������������� 7,809,000������������� 7,730,910[15]
2007���������������������� 7,576,000����������������������������� 7,731,000������������� 7,731,000������������� 7,777,652[16]
2008���������������������� 8,096,000����������������������������� 8,096,000������������� 7,954,563������������� 7,954,563
2009���������������������� 8,653,000����������������������������� 8,653,000������������� 8,653,000������������� 8,653,000
2010���������������������� 9,857,567����������������������������� 9,857,567���������� 10,358,000���������� 10,358,000[17]
2011���������������������� 13,105,000��������������������������
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
Staffing
History Table
Fiscal
Year��������������������������������������������������������������������������� FTE**
1986�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 47
1987�������������������������� ����������������������� ����������������������������������� 51
1988�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 52
1989�������������������������� ����������������������������������������������������������� 51
1990�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 48
1991�������������������������� ����������������������������������������������������������� 47
1992�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 56
1993�������������������������� ����������������������������������������������������������� 53
1994�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 53
1995�������������������������� ����������������������������������������������������������� 55
1996�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 52
1997 ������������������������� ����������������������������������������������������������� 50
1998�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 47
1999 ������������������������� ����������������������������������������������������������� 45
2000 ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 43
2001 ������������������������� ����������������������������������������������������������� 42
2002�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 38
2003 ������������������������� ����������������������������������������������������������� 35
2004 ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 40
2005 ������������������������� ����������������������������������������������������������� 40
2006 ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 41
2007�������������������������� ����������������������������������������������������������� 44
2008�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 48
2009 ������������������������� ����������������������������������������������������������� 50
2010�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 62*
2011�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 77*
* Estimates
** FTE for FY 2009 and before represent the FTE ceiling given budget
authority, not the actual FTE.
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review
Commission
Selected
Workload Data
����������������������������������������������������������������������� 2009
Actual�������������� 2010 est.������� 2011 est.
Commission Review Activities
Cases pending beginning of year����������������������� 103���������������� ����������� � 95����������������� 105
New cases received����������������������������������������������� 184���������������������������� 200���������������� 205
Total case workload������������������������������������ 287���������������������������� 295���������������� 310
Cases decided�������������������������������������������� 192���������������������������� 190���������������� 195
Cases pending end of year���������������������������������� � 95����������������������������� 105���������������� 115
Administrative Law
Judges Activities
Cases pending beginning of year����������������������� 9,737������������������������� 14,213������ 18,247
New cases received����������������������������������������������� 9,239������������������������� � 9,200��������
9,200
Total case workload������������������������ ����� ���18,976�������������������������� 23,413������ 27,447
Cases decided�������������������������������� ���������� 4,766�� ����������������������� � 5,166������
��7,750
Cases pending end of year���������� ������������������� 14,213��������������������������� 18,247������ 19,697
[1] This total reflects actual FTE usage, which is calculated cumulatively for the fiscal year. This differs from the FTE ceiling reported in other tables, which represents the maximum number of FTE that the agency could support given budget authority.�
[2]�� Reflects reduction of $164,000 pursuant to P.L. 99-177.
[3]�� Reflects reduction of $14,000 pursuant to Sec. 512 of P.L. 100-202.
[4]�� Reflects reduction of $49,000 pursuant to Sec. 517 of P.L. 100-436.
[5]�� Reflects reduction of $103,437 pursuant to Sec. 514(b) of P.L. 101-517 and $54 pursuant to P.L. 99-177.
[6]�� Reflects reduction of $46,000 pursuant to Sec. 511 of P.L. 102-394.
[7]�� Reflects reduction of $11,000 pursuant to Sec. 2007 of P.L. 104-19.
[8]�� Reflects reduction of $9,000 pursuant to Sec. 513 and $7,000 pursuant to Sec. 31002 of P.L. 104-134.
[9]�� Reflects reduction of $11,000 pursuant to Sec. 519 of P.L. 104-208.
[10]�� Reflects reduction of $23,000 pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act for 2000, P.L. 106-113.
[11] Reflects reduction of $5,000 pursuant to Sectiom1403 of P.L. 107-206.
[12] Reflects adjustments pursuant to the Omnibus Appropriations Act, P.L. 108-7.
[13]� Reflects reduction of $45,867 pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, P.L. 108-199.
[14]� Reflects a congressional add-on of $59,000 and a reduction of $62,976 pursuant to section 122(a) of P.L.108-447.
[15]� Reflects reduction of $78,090 pursuant to Title III, Chapter 8, of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, P.L. 109-148.
[16] Reflects reduction of $144,437 pursuant to Sec. 528(a) of P.L.
[17]� Reflects Senate Approved Mark-up of $500,000 pursuant of P.L.