FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 520N

Washington, DC 20004

 

 

SECRETARY OF LABOR

  MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH   

  ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),

  on behalf of JASON WYLIE,

                           Complainant,

 

                        v.

 

ALLEGHENY MINERAL

  CORPORATION,

                           Respondent.

 

SECRETARY OF LABOR

  MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH   

  ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),

                           Petitioner,

 

                        v.

 

ALLEGHENY MINERAL

  CORPORATION,

                           Respondent.

 

 

DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING

 

 

Docket No. PENN 2018-0158-DM

MSHA No. NE MD 2018-01

 

 

Mine: Bison Mine

Mine ID: 36-10107

 

 

 

CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING

 

 

Docket No. PENN 2018-0275

 

 

 

Mine: Bison Mine

Mine ID: 36-10107

 

 

ORDER SCHEDULING PREHEARING

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE

 

Before: Judge Feldman

 

            The captioned matters were severed in an Order that established and severed newly created Docket No. PENN 2018-0275 concerning the Secretary’s civil penalty proceeding from Docket No. PENN 2018-0158-DM that is limited to issues concerning the merits of Wylie’s discrimination complaint and his claim for relief. Severance Order, 40 FMSHRC ___, Slip op.

at 4, (Oct. 23, 2018). These matters were severed as a consequence of the Secretary’s withdrawal from the parties’ verbal settlement agreement that would have resolved the issues of both the compensatory relief to be awarded to Wylie and the amount of the civil penalty to be paid in this matter. Id. at 2. Currently before me is Allegheny’s Motion to Approve Settlement with Wylie that apparently concerns the identical settlement terms with respect to compensatory relief that were informally accepted but subsequently rejected by the Secretary. Allegheny’s Agreement and Mot. to Approve Settlement at 3-4 (Nov. 21, 2018).

 

 

 


The record contains conflicting statements concerning whether Wylie has agreed to settle. In an email transmitted on September 28, 2018, Wylie unequivocally advised the Commission that he agreed to the settlement terms with regard to his monetary relief, and, that he was not interested in participating in a hearing. See Order Denying Sec’y’s Mot. for Recon., 40 FMSHRC ___, Slip op. at 2 (Nov. 8, 2018). Nevertheless, the Secretary now asserts that Wylie has rejected the settlement because, “[Wylie] has embraced [the] desire to serve the broader public purpose of deterring future discrimination and does not want his to be the test case allowing the routine confidential resolution [of] discrimination cases.” Sec’y’s Mot. to Recons. Severance Order at 5 (Oct 26, 2018). However, issues concerning deterrence go beyond the scope of the discrimination proceeding in Docket No. PENN 2018-0158-DM, which is limited to the issue of Wylie’s entitlement to monetary relief.

 

Commission Rule 4(a) provides, in pertinent part:

 

In a proceeding instituted by the Secretary under section 105(c)(2) of the Act, 30 U.S.C. [§] 815(c)(2), the complainant on whose behalf the Secretary has filed the complaint is a party . . . .

 

29 C.F.R. § 2700.4(a); Sec’y of Labor v. Mountain Top Trucking Co., 18 FMSHRC 487, 488 (April 1996).

 

 As a party, Wylie does not require the Secretary’s approval for his agreement to settle the issue of his monetary relief. Consequently, a telephone conference with Wylie, opposing counsel for Allegheny, and the Secretary will be scheduled so I can hear directly from Wylie whether he accepts the settlement terms with respect to the amount of his compensatory relief, or, whether Wylie chooses to pursue his claim of alleged discrimination through an evidentiary hearing. The telephone conference will be limited solely to the motion to approve settlement between Allegheny and Wylie in Docket No. PENN 2018-0158-DM. The telephone conference will not address the issues concerning deterrence-related sanctions that are the subject of

Docket No. PENN 2018-0275.

 

The telephone conference will be recorded and transcribed. To preserve the pending nature of Allegheny’s request for confidentiality, the transcript of the telephone conference will be placed under seal.

 

ORDER

 

Consequently, consistent with the above, IT IS ORDERED that the captioned parties participate in a conference call scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 22, 2019. The parties will receive an email containing the information required to participate in the conference call.

 

            Any procedural questions concerning the matters discussed herein should be directed to my Law Clerk, Noah Meyer, at nmeyer@fmshrc.gov or (202) 233-4010.

 

 

 

 

                                                                        /s/ Jerold Feldman

Jerold Feldman

Administrative Law Judge

 

 

Distribution (by regular and certified mail):

 

Oscar L. Hampton III, Regional Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor,

Suite 630E, The Curtis Center, 170 S. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106

hampton.oscar@dol.gov

 

Matthew R. Epstein, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, Suite 630E,

The Curtis Center, 170 S. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106

epstein.matthew.r@dol.gov

 

Jason Wylie, 604 Vanadium Road, Bridgeville, PA 15017 airborne_medic12@yahoo.com

 

Patrick W. Dennison, Esq., Jackson Kelly PLLC, Three Gateway Center, Suite 1500,

401 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15222 pwdennison@jacksonkelly.com

 

/nm