<DOC>
[DOCID: f:k93646.wais]

 
MANALAPAN MINING COMPANY
September 11, 1996
KENT 93-646

           FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

                 OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
                        2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
                          5203 LEESBURG PIKE
                    FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA  22041


                          September 11, 1996



SECRETARY OF LABOR,               :  CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
 MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH           :
 ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),           :  Docket No. KENT 93-646
               Petitioner         :  A.C. No. 15-05423-03734
                                  :
                    v.            :
                                  :
MANALAPAN MINING COMPANY,         :  Mine No. 1
               Respondent         :
                                  :  Docket No. KENT 93-884
                                  :  A.C. No. 15-16733-03546
                                  :
                                  :  Mine No. 7

                          DECISION ON REMAND

Before: Judge Weisberger

     On August 30, 1996, the Commission issued a decision in these
cases in which it, inter alia, reversed my decision (16 FMSHRC 
1669 (August 1994)), that Order No. 4238749 was not S & S, and 
remanded the matter to me "for penalty reassessment" (Docket No.
KENT 93-646, et al., 18 FMSHRC    , slip op. at 9, (August 30, 
1996)).[1]

     I take cognizance of the Commission recitation of the
Secretary's evidence showing the following: two miners were in 
the mines for four hours without a preshift examination; the
miners' equipment included torches; the bolter was energized;
there was a possibility of the presence of low oxygen; and that
the mine roof had a tendency to fall, and the mine had experienced
several roof falls.  The Commission also noted as follows: "During
idle periods, methane can build up, and other unforseen hazards 
can develop." (slip op. supra, at 8).  Based on these factors, I 
find that the gravity of the violation was relatively high.  I 
also reiterate my initial finding that Respondent's conduct was 
more than ordinary negligence (16 FMSHRC supra, at 1703). I thus
find that a penalty of $5,000 is appropriate for the violation
cited in this order.

     It is ORDERED that, within 30 days of this decision. 
Respondent shall pay a total civil penalty of $5,000 for the 
violation cited in Order No. 4238749, minus any penalty 
previously paid for this violation.


                                  Avram Weisberger
                                  Administrative Law Judge


Distribution:

Joseph B. Luckett, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department 
of Labor, 2002 Richard Jones Road, Suite B-201, Nashville, TN 37215
(Certified Mail)

Susan C. Lawson, Esq., Lawson & Lawson, P.S.C., P.O. Box 837,
Harlan, KY 40831 (Certified Mail)

/ml


**FOOTNOTES**

     [1]:Pursuant to the Commission's direction, I hereby correct
a clerical oversight with respect to Docket No. KENT 93-882, and 
indicate that it contained only one Citation i.e., No. 3003352, 
which was vacated.  I thus order that Docket No. KENT 93-882 be dismissed.





           FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

                 OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
                        2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
                          5203 LEESBURG PIKE
                    FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA  22041



SECRETARY OF LABOR,               :  CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
  MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH          :
  ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),          :  Docket No. KENT 93-646
                Petitioner        :  A.C. No. 15-05423-03734
                                  :
                    v.            :
                                  :
MANALAPAN MINING COMPANY,         :  Mine No. 1
                Respondent        :
                                  :  Docket No. KENT 93-884
                                  :  A.C. No. 15-16733-03546
                                  :
                                  :  Mine No. 7

                           AMENDED DECISION

Before: Judge Weisberger

     Due to clerical error, the second paragraph of the decision
in these cases isued on September 11, 1996, is amended to read 
as follows:

     I take cognizance of the Commission's recitation of the
Secretary's evidence showing the following: two miners were in 
the mine for four hours without a preshift examination; the
miners' equipment included torches; the bolter was energized; 
there was a possibility of the presence of low oxygen; and that
the mine roof had a tendency to fall, and the mine had experienced
several roof falls.  The Commission also noted as follows: 
"During idle periods, methane can build up, and other unforseen
hazards can develop."  (slip op. supra, at 8). Based on these
factors, I find that the gravity of the violation was relatively
high.  I also reiterate my initial finding that Respondent's
conduct was more than ordinary negligence (16 FMSHRC supra, at
1703).  I thus find that a penalty of $5,000 is appropriate for
the violation cited in this order.


                                  Avram Weisberger
                                  Administrative Law Judge


Distribution:

Joseph B. Luckett, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department
of Labor, 2002 Richard Jones Road, Suite B-201, Nashville, TN 37215
(Certified Mail)

Susan C. Lawson, Esq., Lawson & Lawson, P.S.C., P.O. Box 837,
Harlan, KY 40831 (Certified Mail)

/ml