<DOC>
[DOCID: f:lk9880.wais]

 
TOW BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, INCORPORATED
March 30, 2000
LAKE 98-80-M


        FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

               OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
                      2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
                       5203 LEESBURG PIKE
                  FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA  22041


                         March 30, 2000

SECRETARY OF LABOR,             : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
  MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH        :
  ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),        : Docket No. LAKE 98-80-M
               Petitioner       : A. C. No. 21-02975-05510
          v.                    :
                                : Docket No. LAKE 98-99-M
TOW BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION,      : A. C. No. 21-02975-05511
  INCORPORATED,                 :
               Respondent       : Cedar Rapids Crusher #F25918

                             DECISION

Appearances: Christine M. Kassak, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, 
             U.S. Department of Labor, Chicago, Illinois, for 
             the Petitioner;
             Arvid Wendland, Esq., Wendland and Timmerman, Blue 
             Earth, Minnesota, for the Respondent.

Before: Judge Feldman

     Before me are petitions for assessment seeking  to impose a
total  civil  penalty of $52,500 filed pursuant to section 110(a)
of the Federal Mine Safety and Health  Act  of  1977  (the  Act),
30 U.S.C. � 820(a),  by  the  Secretary  of Labor (the Secretary)
against  the  respondent,  Tow Brothers Construction,  Inc.  (Tow
Brothers).  This matter concerns a serious accident that occurred
on  November  11,  1996, involving  Tow  Brothers  foreman  Wayne
Walter.  The accident  occurred  when  Walter's  right  hand  and
forearm  were  caught  in  an  unguarded  trap feed conveyor head
pulley  as  Walter  was performing maintenance  activities.   Tow
Brothers is a closely held family corporation with brothers James
and Robert Tow each holding 50 per cent of the outstanding shares
of the corporation.

     These matters were  called  for hearing on February 9, 2000,
in  Fairmont,  Minnesota.   After several  conferences  with  the
parties' counsel, during which  time  I explained the application
of the penalty criterion in section 110(i)  of  the Mine Act with
respect  to the effect on the operator's ability to  continue  in
business,  the  parties  reached settlement.[1]   Specifically, I
noted the capitalization structure  of  closely held corporations
is  intended  to  limit  liability.  Consequently,  although  the
corporations  small  size,  and  the  financial  information  and
documentation  submitted  by  Tow   Brothers,   were  appropriate
considerations,  the  corporation's purported inability  to  pay,
alone, did not relieve  Tow  Brothers  of its liability under the
Mine Act.

     The parties' settlement terms were set forth and approved on
the  record.   The  settlement  terms  included   Tow   Brothers'
agreement to pay a reduced civil penalty from $52,500 to $22,500.
Pursuant  to  my  direction  at trial, the Secretary has filed  a
written summary of the parties'  settlement  agreement.   As part
of their settlement, the parties have stipulated:

     (a)   The   Federal   Mine  Safety  and  Health  Review
     Commission has jurisdiction over these proceedings.

     (b) Tow Brothers is a corporation.

     (c) Tow Brothers' operations affect interstate commerce.

     (d) At all times relevant to the instant proceedings, Tow
     Brothers operated the Cedar Rapids Crusher #F25918.

     (e)  The Cedar Rapids Crusher #F25918 extracted sand and
     gravel.

     (f) The Cedar Rapids Crusher #F25918 worked less than 10,000
     hours in the  period November 12, 1995, through November 11,
     1996.

     (h) Tow Brothers committed one (1) violation of a health and
     safety regulation in the 24 month period ending on December 
     31, 1996.

     (i) Tow Brothers has agreed to pay the reduced civil penalty
     according to the payment plan detailed below.

     The settlement terms as they apply to Docket Number LAKE 
98-80-M are:

     Citation  Date Issued  30 C.F.R.    Assessment  Settlement

     4421526   11/13/96    56.14107(a)     $18,000     $7,700
     4421527   11/13/96    56.14203        $20,000     $8,500
     4421528   11/13/96    56.11001        $10,000     $4,500

                                    TOTAL  $48,000    $20,700

          (1) The serious gravity associated with these citations
          remains unchanged.

          (2) The degree of negligence specified in the citations
          is unchanged.

          (3) Tow Brothers demonstrated its good faith by abating
          the citations  within  the  time  allowed  by  the MSHA
          inspector.

          (4) The reduced penalty assessment is appropriate based
          on Tow Brothers' small size and financial limitations.

     The settlement terms as they apply to Docket Number LAKE 
98-99-M are:

     Citation  Date Issued  30 C.F.R.    Assessment  Settlement

     4421529   11/13/96    56.14107(a)      $1,500      $600
     4421530   11/13/96    56.14107(a)      $1,500      $600
     4421531   11/13/96    56.14107(a)      $1,500      $600

                                     TOTAL  $4,500    $1,800

          (1) The gravity of the cited violations is unchanged.

          (2) The degree of negligence specified in the citations
          is unchanged.

          (3) Tow Brothers demonstrated its good faith by abating
          the  citations  within  the  time  allowed  by the MSHA
          inspector.

          (4) The reduced penalty assessment is appropriate based
          on Tow Brothers' small size and financial limitations.

     The  parties  have  agreed  to  the  following  schedule  of
payments:  Tow  Brothers will pay  $6,500 on March 15, 2000.  [2]
The remainder of  the  installments  will  be  paid  in eight (8)
quarterly  payments  of  $2,000  each,  payable on or before  the
following dates: June 15, 2000, September  15, 2000, December 15,
2000, March 15, 2001, June 15, 2001, September 15, 2001, December
15, 2001, with the last payment made on or before March 15, 2002.
If  payments  are  not  made  in  accordance  with  this  payment
schedule,  the  remaining  balance of the $22,500  civil  penalty
shall due and payable immediately.

     Payments  shall  be made  to  the  Mine  Safety  and  Health
Administration, ATTN: Dorothy  Johnson, 4015 Wilson  Blvd.,  Room  
926,  Arlington,  VA 22203.

                              ORDER

     As noted  on  the  record  at  trial,  I  conclude  that the
proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set  forth
in Section 110(i) of the Act.  WHEREFORE, the parties' motion for
approval  of  settlement  IS GRANTED, and, IT IS ORDERED that Tow
Brothers Construction, Inc.,  pay  a  $22,500  civil  penalty  in
accordance  with  the above payment schedule and, upon receipt of
timely payment of the  entire  $22,500  penalty,  these cases ARE
DISMISSED.


                                  Jerold Feldman
                                  Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Christine  M.  Kassak,  Esq.,  Office  of  the  Solicitor,   U.S.
Department of Labor,
230 S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL 60604  (Certified Mail)

Arvid  Wendland,  Esq.,  Wendland  and Timmerman, 825 East Second
Street, P.O. Box 247,
Blue Earth, MN 56013 (Certified Mail)

Mr. James R. Tow, President, Robin C.  Peterson,  Acct.  Manager,
Tow  Brothers  Construction,  Inc., R.R. 3, Box 118A, Truman,  MN
56088  (Certified Mail)

/mh


**FOOTNOTES**

     [1]: The statutory civil penalty  criteria in section 110(i)
of the Act, 30 U.S.C. � 820(i), provides,  in  pertinent part, in
assessing civil penalties:

     the Commission shall consider the operator's  history  of 
     previous violations, the appropriateness of such penalty 
     to the size of the business  of  the  operator  charged,  
     whether the operator was negligent,  the  effect  on  the 
     operator's ability to continue in business, the gravity of 
     the violation, and the demonstrated good faith  of  the  
     person charged in attempting to achieve rapid compliance 
     after notification of a violation.

     [2] As of March 24, 2000, the first installment of $6,500 had 
not yet  been  received by MSHA's Office  of Assessments. I assume
payment has  been  delayed  pending  the issuance of this decision
formalizing  the  parties' agreement.  If  payment  of  the  first
$6,500 installment  is  not received within 21 days of the date of
this decision, the Secretary  may  file  a  motion  for  a default
judgment  that seeks to impose the $52,500 civil penalty initially
proposed in these matters.