FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
October 28, 2011
SECRETARY OF LABOR, MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
CAM MINING, LLC |
: : : : : : : |
Docket Nos. KENT 2009-444 KENT 2009-445 KENT 2009-446 |
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, Cohen, and Nakamura, Commissioners
DIRECTION FOR REVIEW AND DECISION
BY THE COMMISSION:
These matters arise under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On September 21, 2011, Administrative Law Judge Gary Melick issued a summary decision finding that the Secretary of Labor (“Secretary”) had shown no factually supported reason for why her petitions for assessment of civil penalty were not timely filed and dismissed the petitions. Unpublished Order at 2 (September 21, 2011). On October 21, 2011, the Secretary filed a Petition for Discretionary Review. For the following reasons, we grant the Secretary’s petition, vacate the judge’s order, and remand for further proceedings.
In her petition, the Secretary notes that on April 2, 2010, Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert Lesnick granted the Secretary’s motions for leave to file penalty petitions out of time. She asserts that Judge Melick erred in failing to take into account that another judge in the same case had previously ruled that adequate cause for the delayed filing of the Secretary’s penalty petitions had been established. She argues that he abused his discretion in setting aside Judge Lesnick’s ruling without discussing the effect of that ruling and without determining if compelling circumstances necessitated that this ruling be set aside.
On October 26, 2011, the Commission received CAM Mining LLC’s (“CAM”) Brief in Opposition to Commission Review. CAM contends that the Commission should deny the Secretary’s Petition for Discretionary Review on the grounds that the summary decision of Judge Melick was correctly decided and that many of the citations at issue are moot because the Secretary has already vacated them. In addition, CAM asserts that there is no authority for the Secretary’s contention that a judge should apply appellate standards on motions for reconsideration before a case is final.
Judge Melick’s summary decision did not acknowledge Chief Judge Lesnick’s earlier order nor did he outline his reasons for declining to follow it. Without this essential information, the Commission cannot determine whether there were sufficient grounds for Judge Melick’s decision.
For the foregoing reasons, we grant the Secretary’s Petition for Discretionary Review, vacate the judge’s summary decision, and remand these matters to Judge Melick for further proceedings.
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan.
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
/s/ Michael F. Duffy
Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner
/s/ Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Robert F. Cohen
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Distribution:
Mark E. Heath, Esq.
Spilman, Thomas & Battle, PLLC
300 Kanawha Blvd. East
P.O. Box 273
Charleston, WV 25321
Jerald S. Feingold, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Administrative Law Judge Gary Melick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N. W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021