FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-1710
September 12, 2012
SECRETARY OF LABOR, MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
BEAVER EXCAVATING COMPANY |
: : : : : : : : |
Docket No. LAKE 2011-163-M A.C. No. 33-00528-236600 X68 |
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Young and Nakamura, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On January 31, 2012, the Commission received from Beaver Excavating Company (“Beaver”) a motion seeking to reopen a settlement agreement and relieve it from the decision approving settlement entered against it.
On June 8, 2011, Chief Administrative Law Judge Lesnick issued a Decision Approving Settlement (“Decision”) in response to the Conference and Litigation Representative’s (“CLR”) motion to approve the proposed settlement.
Beaver asserts that the Decision does not accurately represent the settlement upon which the parties had agreed. In particular, Beaver believes that the Secretary of Labor accepted Beaver’s proposal to downgrade the level of the special assessment based on unwarrantable failure, but that the settlement order did not reflect this.
The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen for the purpose of adjudicating the operator’s claim, but notes that her non-opposition should not be construed as agreement with the operator’s claim. The Secretary also notes that the Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) received payment for the amount Beaver was ordered to pay in the Decision, by check dated September 23, 2011.
Under the Mine Act and the Commission’s procedural rules, relief from a judge’s decision may be sought by filing a petition for discretionary review within 30 days of its issuance. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2)(A)(i); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.70(a). If the Commission does not direct review within 40 days of a decision’s issuance, it becomes a final decision of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). Consequently, the judge’s order here has become a final decision of the Commission.
In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which, for example, a party could be entitled to relief from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993).
Having reviewed Beaver’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of justice, we hereby reopen the proceeding and vacate the Decision. Accordingly, this case is remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Chair
/s/Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Distribution:
Keith Ashmus, Esq.
Julie L. Pietrzen, Esq.
Frantz Ward, LLP
2500 Key Ctr.
127 Public Square
Cleveland, OH 44114-1230
kashmus@frantzward.com
jpietrzen@frantzward.com
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N. W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021