FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1710

 

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

  MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH       

  ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)           

 

                        v.

 

C&C LEASING & EXCAVATING, INC.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 

 

 

Docket No. WEVA 2023-0536

A.C. No. 46-06448-577602

 

 

 

 

BEFORE:  Jordan, Chair; Althen, Rajkovich, Baker, and Marvit, Commissioners

           

ORDER

 

BY THE COMMISSION:

 

            This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2018) (“Mine Act”). On September 14, 2023, the Commission received from C&C Leasing & Excavating, Inc. (“C&C”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

 

            Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

 

            We have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which the Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).

 

 

            Records of the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) indicate that the proposed assessment was delivered to C&C on June 5, 2023. The assessment became a final order of the Commission on July 5, 2023. On August 21, 2023, MSHA sent the operator a delinquency notice.

 

            C&C submits that its owner receives and sends proposed penalty assessments to its safety consultant to analyze and determine whether to contest the proposals. However, because its owner was in and out of the hospital due to sickness, he failed to send the subject proposed penalty assessment to C&C’s safety consultant for processing. The operator states that C&C has incorporated a plan to designate another employee to be responsible during any absences to ensure future timely submissions. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen but urges the operator to take steps to ensure that future penalty contests are timely filed.  

                                                           

            Having reviewed C&C’s request and the Secretary’s response, we find that the operator acted with excusable neglect due to the medical circumstances and hospitalization surrounding the operator’s owner. See Benton Cty Stone Co., 45 FMSHRC 485, 486 (June 2023). In the interest of justice, we hereby reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.

 

 

 

/s/ Mary Lu Jordan

                                                                                    Mary Lu Jordan, Chair

 

 

 

/s/ William I. Althen

William I. Althen, Commissioner

 

 

 

/s/ Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.

Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr., Commissioner

 

 

 

/s/ Timothy J. Baker

Timothy J. Baker, Commissioner

 

 

 

/s/ Moshe Z. Marvit

Moshe Z. Marvit, Commissioner

 


 

Distribution:

 

Christopher D. Pence, Esq.

Pence Law Firm PLLC

10th Hale Street, 4th Floor

Post Office Box 2548

Charleston, WV 25329-2548

cpence@pencefirm.com

 

April Nelson, Esq.

Associate Solicitor

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

Division of Mine Safety and Health

201 12th Street South, Suite 401

Arlington, VA 22202

Nelson.April@dol.gov

 

Emily Toler Scott, Esq.

Counsel for Appellate Litigation

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

Division of Mine Safety and Health

201 12th Street South, Suite 401

Arlington, VA 22202

scott.emily.t@dol.gov

 

Melanie Garris
USDOL/MSHA, OAASEI/CPCO
201 12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202
Garris.Melanie@DOL.GOV

 

Chief Administrative Law Judge Glynn F. Voisin
Federal Mine Safety Health Review Commission

Office of the Chief Administrative Law Judge
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 520N
Washington, DC 20004-1710
GVoisin@fmshrc.gov