FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1710

 

                                                                           

 

SECRETARY OF LABOR,                             :                                     

 MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH                    :                                                         

 ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)                       :       

                                                                           :

                                                                           :        Docket No. WEST 2015-311-M        

                        v.                                                :        A.C. No. 05-04643-364815

                                                                           :                   

VARRA COMPANIES, INC.                          :

                                                                       

                                                                          

 

BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Young, Cohen, and Althen, Commissioners

 

ORDER

 

BY THE COMMISSION:

 

This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.    § 801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On January 21, 2015, the Commission received from Varra Companies, Inc. (“Varra”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

 

            Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

            We have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which the Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).

 

            Records of the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) demonstrate that the proposed assessment was delivered on October 23, 2014, and became a final order of the Commission on November 24, 2014. The operator claims that it contested several proposed assessments at once, including the one in question, and that MSHA received the contest of the other cases. The operator provides certified mail receipts for October 28, 2014 and October 30, 2014, which were the dates that the operator mailed in the contest forms. The operator asserts that it contacted MSHA as soon as it received a delinquency notice sent on January 7, 2014. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen, and confirms that Varra contacted MSHA as soon as it received the delinquency notice. However, the Secretary notes that there is no record that the contest form was ever received by MSHA. The Secretary urges Varra to ensure that contests to future penalty assessments are mailed to the appropriate address in a timely manner.

                                                                                                      

            Having reviewed Varra’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of justice, we hereby reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.

 

 

 

/s/ Mary Lu Jordan

Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman

 

 

 

/s/ Michael G. Young

Michael G. Young, Commissioner

 

 

 

/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.

Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner

 

 

 

/s/ William I. Althen

William I. Althen, Commissioner

 

Distribution:

 

Vickie Archuleta

HR/Payroll Manager/Safety

Varra Companies

8120 Gage Street

Frederick, CO 80516

 

W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

201 12th St. South, Suite 500

Arlington, VA 22202-5450

 

Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

1331 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Suite 520N

Washington, DC 20004-1710

 

Melanie Garris

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance

Mine Safety and Health Administration

U.S. Department of Labor

201 12th St. South, Suite 500

Arlington, VA 22202-5450