FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1710
SECRETARY OF LABOR, MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
v.
CASTILLO READY MIX, INC. |
: : : : : : : |
Docket No. CENT 2018-27-M A.C. No. 29-02237-444887
|
BEFORE: Althen, Acting Chairman; Jordan, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On October 31, 2017, the Commission received from Castillo Ready Mix, Inc. (“Castillo”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had appeared to become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
On August 3, 2017, the Secretary issued a proposed penalty assessment to Castillo. Castillo asserts that the operator always intended to contest Citation No. 9355405 but that the person tasked with handling the paperwork was ill at the time of the citation and subsequently passed away.[1] The operator believed that the paperwork had been misplaced and had not been timely contested. However, documents submitted by the Secretary show that the assessment in this matter was listed as delivered by the U.S. Postal service on October 17, 2017, and also listed as “unclaimed.” Further, MSHA’s records indicate that a contest for the assessment of Citation No. 9355405 was mailed on October 27, 2017 and received by MSHA on October 31, 2017. That penalty contest was docketed as CENT 2018-30-M
Having reviewed Castillo’s request and the Secretary’s response, we conclude that the proposed penalty assessment did not become a final order of the Commission because the operator timely contested the proposed assessment. Section 105(a) states that if an operator “fails to notify the Secretary that he intends to contest the . . . proposed assessment of penalty . . . the citation and the proposed assessment of penalty shall be deemed a final order of the Commission.” 30 U.S.C. § 815(a). Here, Castillo notified the Secretary of the contest. This obviates any need to invoke Rule 60(b). Because Castillo timely contested the proposed penalty and the Secretary filed the necessary civil proceeding before the Commission, the operator’s motion to reopen is moot. Accordingly, this case is remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.
/s/ William I. Althen
William I. Althen, Acting Chairman
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner
/s/ Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
Distribution:
Paula Castillo
Castillo Ready Mix, Inc.
116 Padilla Rd.
Belen, NM 87002
Ali Beydoun, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
201 12th St. South, Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202-5450
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
1331 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Suite 520N
Washington, DC 20004-1710
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
Mine Safety and Health Administration
U.S. Department of Labor
201 12th St. South, Suite 500
Arlington, VA 22202-5450
[1] The operator filed medical reports, a birth certificate, and other private documents with its request to reopen to substantiate this claim. The Commission has placed copies of these personal records under seal. We ask that the Secretary destroy any copies of those records that he received from the Castillo.