FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1710
May 21, 2026
|
SECRETARY OF LABOR
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) v. PAULSEN INC., |
|
|
Docket No. CENT 2026-0069 A.C. No. 25-00540-630877 |
BEFORE: Rajkovich, Chair; Jordan, and Baker, Commissioners
ORDER
BY: THE
COMMISSION
This matter arises under the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2024) (“Mine Act”). On January 16, 2026, the Commission received
from Paulsen Inc., (“Paulsen”) a motion to reopen a final order of the
Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an
operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of
Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If
the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is
deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
We have held, however, that in appropriate
circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that
have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res.,
Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final orders,
the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, under which the Commission may relieve a party from a final order of
the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence,
excusable neglect, or other reason justifying relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the
Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh
remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a
failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings
on the merits permitted. See Coal
Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
Records of the Department of Labor’s Mine
Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) indicate that the proposed
assessment was delivered on December 2, 2025, and became a final
order of the Commission on January 2, 2026.
Paulsen contends that it did not timely file
to contest because it mistakenly paid the penalties. In an attached affidavit the Aggregate
Division Manager, certified that “the penalties were paid based upon mistake or
inadvertence.” Ex. A. The manager further explains that she
believed that the citations had been issued to “one of Paulsen’s other
locations that had recently been inspected.”
Ex. A.
The Secretary opposes the operator’s
motion, contending that the operator’s asserted reason for failing to timely file lack required detail. We agree.
Paulsen’s motion lacks specificity. For instance, it does not contain the
identity of Paulsen’s second mine or the date upon which the inspection
occurred. The Commission has
consistently required that the operator provide known
details, including dates and persons involved, when proffering an explanation
to account for their failure to timely file.
See Higgins Stone Co., 32 FMSHRC 33, 34 (Jan. 2010). General assertions are insufficient when an
operator seeks a grant of relief pursuant to Rule 60(b). See Southwest Rock Products, Inc., 45
FMSHRC 747-48 (Aug. 2023).
Furthermore, the Secretary has called the veracity
of Paulsen’s position into question. The
Secretary represents that MSHA has not received
payment for the civil penalties at issue.
In fact, the Secretary’s Mine Data Retrieval System reflects that the civil
penalties for the four citations at issue remain unpaid.[1] MSHA, Mine Data Retrieval System, https://www.msha.gov/data-and-reports/mine-data-retrieval-system
(last visited, May 20, 2026).
For
these reasons, we find that Paulsen has failed to establish good cause for a
failure to timely file. Its motion is denied with prejudice.
%20CENT%202026-0069_files/image002.png)
_________________________________
Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr., Chair
%20CENT%202026-0069_files/image004.png)
_________________________________
Mary
Lu Jordan, Commissioner
_________________________________
Timothy J. Baker, Commissioner
Distribution:
Adele
L. Abrams, Esq., ASP, CMSP
Littler Mendelson PC
815
Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 400
Washington,
DC 20006
aabrams@littler.com
Alexandra J. Gilewicz,
Esq.
Thomas A. Paige, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
Division of Mine Safety and Health
200 Constitution Avenue NW, Suite N4428
Washington, DC 20210
Gilewicz.alexandra.j@dol.gov
Paige.Thomas.a@dol.gov
Melanie Garris
US Department of Labor/MSHA
Office of Assessments, Room N3454
200 Constitution Ave NW
Washington, DC 20210
Garris.Melanie@dol.gov
Acting Chief Judge David P. Simonton
Federal Mine Safety Health Review Commission
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 520N
Washington, DC 20004-1710
DSimonton@fmshrc.gov
[1] Citation Nos. 6947802,
6947803, 6947804, and 6947805 are listed as delinquent unpaid penalties in the
MDRS.