FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW

SUITE 9500

WASHINGTON, DC 20001

May 14, 2009


SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

v.

HANCOCK MATERIALS, INC.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:


Docket No. WEST 2009-423-M
A.C. No. 42-01122-150148

BEFORE: Duffy, Chairman; Jordan and Young, Commissioners Footnote


ORDER


BY THE COMMISSION:


            This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On January 22, 2009, the Commission received a letter seeking to reopen a penalty assessment issued to Hancock Materials, Inc. (“Hancock”) that may have become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).


            Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).


            Hancock seeks reopening on the grounds that it became aware of Proposed Assessment No. 000150148 more than 30 days after it had been issued, at a time when the operator was no longer in business. The Secretary of Labor confirms that Hancock was no longer in business when the proposed assessment was mailed and further states that the proposed assessment was returned to the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) as undelivered. She submits that because service of the proposed assessment was not achieved, the assessment did not become a valid final order. The Secretary states that she will mail the proposed assessment to the address provided by Hancock, and Hancock will then have 30 days after receipt to either pay the proposed assessment or contest it.


            Having reviewed Hancock’s request and the Secretary’s response, we deny Hancock’s motion as moot. The Secretary may mail the proposed assessment to Hancock at the address provided in this proceeding, and this case shall proceed pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Footnote See Lehigh Cement Co., 28 FMSHRC 440, 441 (July 2006).






____________________________________

Michael F. Duffy, Chairman






____________________________________

Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner






____________________________________

Michael G. Young, Commissioner






Distribution:


Dirk Hancock

Hancock Materials, Inc.

360 South 5th Place

Show Low, AZ 85901


W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220

Arlington, VA 22209-2296


Myra James, Chief

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance

MSHA

U.S. Dept. of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor

Arlington, VA 22209-3939


Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001-2021