FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
September 14, 2009
SECRETARY OF LABOR, MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) v. HERITAGE COAL & NATURAL RESOURCES, LLC |
: : : : : : : : |
|
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On June 15, 2009, the Commission received a request to reopen a penalty assessment issued to Heritage Coal & Natural Resources, LLC (“Heritage”) that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
We have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final section 105(a) orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which, for example, a party could be entitled to relief from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
On March 3, 2009, the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) issued Assessment No. 000178016 to Heritage, proposing penalties for two citations and two orders MSHA had previously issued to the operator. Heritage, which neither paid nor contested the penalties, states that it would like to reopen the assessment because it had requested but never received a conference with MSHA on the citations and orders and the operator’s alleged negligence.
The Secretary opposes Heritage’s request to reopen. She states that MSHA has no record of a request for a conference by Heritage, and that in any event a request for a conference does not toll the 30 days an operator has in which to contest proposed penalties.
Having reviewed Heritage’s request and the Secretary’s response, we conclude that Heritage has failed to provide an adequate explanation for its failure to timely contest Proposed Assessment No. 000178016. Accordingly, we deny without prejudice Heritage’s request to reopen. The words “without prejudice” mean Heritage may submit another request to reopen so that it can contest the citations, orders, and penalty assessments.
____________________________________
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
____________________________________
>Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner
____________________________________
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
____________________________________
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
Distribution:
Melissa Whipkey, Office Mngr.
Heritage Coal & Natural Resources, LLC
208 West Mud Pike Rd.
Rockwood, PA 15557
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Myra James, Chief
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance, MSHA
U.S. Dept. of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021