FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW

SUITE 9500

WASHINGTON, DC 20001

December 14, 2007

 

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)


v.

NORTH AMERICAN SALT COMPANY

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Docket No. CENT 2008-22-M
A.C. No. 16-00358-119151


BEFORE: Duffy, Chairman; Jordan and Young, Commissioners


ORDER


BY THE COMMISSION:


            This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2000) (“Mine Act”). On September 24, 2007, the Commission received from

North American Salt Company (“North American Salt”) a letter seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).


            Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).


            On May 30, 2007, the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) issued a proposed penalty assessment to North American Salt covering 31 citations. In its letter, North American Salt states that it attempted to contest one of the citations, No. 6240760, by checking the pertinent box on the assessment form. It also submits a letter allegedly sent to an MSHA official dated June 11, 2007, stating that it wanted to contest the citation. In response, the Secretary states that, although she has no record of receiving the assessment form, she does not oppose reopening the proceeding.


            We have held that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final section 105(a) orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which, for example, a party could be entitled to relief from a final order of the Commission on the basis of inadvertence or mistake. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).


            Having reviewed North American Salt’s request, in the interests of justice, we remand this matter to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for a determination of whether good cause exists for North American Salt’s failure to timely contest the penalty proposal and whether relief from the final order should be granted. If it is determined that such relief is appropriate, this case shall proceed pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.




                                                                                    ____________________________________

                                                                                    Michael F. Duffy, Chairman




                                                                                    ____________________________________

                                                                                    Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner




                                                                                    ____________________________________

                                                                                    Michael G. Young, Commissioner



Distribution:


Scott Fountain

North American Salt Company

P.O. Box 10

Lydia, LA 70569


W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U. S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Boulevard, Room 2220

Arlington, VA 22209-2296


Myra James, Chief

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance, MSHA

U. S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Boulevard, 25th Floor

Arlington, VA 22209-3939


Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

601 New Jersey Avenue, N. W., Suite 9500

Washington, D. C. 20001