FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW

SUITE 9500

WASHINGTON, DC 20001

January 22, 2009

 

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

v.

PETRA MATERIALS
:
:
:
:
:
:
:


Docket No. CENT 2008-735-M
A.C. No. 41-04518-157473

Docket No. CENT 2008-736-M
A.C. No. 41-04518-140610


BEFORE: Duffy, Chairman; Jordan, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners


ORDER


BY THE COMMISSION:


            This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). Footnote On September 5, 2008, the Commission received from Petra Materials (“Petra”) a letter seeking to reopen penalty assessments that had become final orders of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).


            Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

 

            On February 14 and July 17, 2008, the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) issued Proposed Penalty Assessment Nos. 000140610 and 000157473, respectively, to Petra for several citations. On September 5, 2008, the Commission received from Petra a letter requesting that the cases be reopened so that the operator could contest and discuss the amounts of the penalties. The operator states that the date to contest the penalties had passed because it “did not know the procedures.”


            On September 30, 2008, the Commission received an opposition from the Secretary, in which the Secretary states that the operator made no showing of circumstances that warrant reopening. In addition, as to Docket No. CENT 2008-736-M, the Secretary notes that MSHA notified Petra by letter dated May 14, 2008, that it was delinquent in paying the proposed assessment. She states that Petra fails to explain why it took three months to seek relief once it received the letter advising that it was delinquent in paying the penalties.


            We have held that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final section 105(a) orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) under which, for example, a party could be entitled to relief from a final order of the Commission on the basis of inadvertence or mistake. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787.


            Having reviewed Petra’s request to reopen and the Secretary’s response thereto, we agree with the Secretary that Petra has failed to provide a sufficiently detailed explanation for its failure to timely contest the proposed penalty assessments. Petra’s conclusory statement that it failed to timely contest because it did “not know the procedures,” and its failure to explain the delay in responding to the delinquency notice in Docket No. CENT 2008-736-M do not provide the Commission with an adequate basis to reopen. Accordingly, we deny without prejudice Petra’s request. See, e.g., BRS Inc., 30 FMSHRC 626, 628 (July 2008); Eastern Associated Coal, LLC, 30 FMSHRC 392, 394 (May 2008). The words “without prejudice” mean Petra may submit another request to reopen the case so that it can contest the citations and penalty assessments. Footnote




                                                                                    ____________________________________

                                                                                    Michael F. Duffy, Chairman


 


                                                                                    ____________________________________

                                                                                    Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner




                                                                                    ____________________________________

                                                                                    Michael G. Young, Commissioner




                                                                                    ____________________________________

                                                                                    Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner 



Distribution:


Raul Villa

Petra Materials

1600 E. Fourth Ave.

El Paso, TX 79901


W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220

Arlington, VA 22209-2296


Myra James, Chief

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance

MSHA

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor

Arlington, VA 22209-3939


Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001-2021