FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
January 22, 2009
SECRETARY OF LABOR, MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) v. PETRA MATERIALS |
: : : : : : : |
Docket No. CENT 2008-735-M A.C. No. 41-04518-157473 Docket No. CENT 2008-736-M A.C. No. 41-04518-140610 |
BEFORE: Duffy, Chairman; Jordan, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”).
On September 5, 2008, the Commission received from
Petra Materials (“Petra”) a letter seeking to reopen penalty assessments that had become final
orders of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
On February 14 and July 17, 2008, the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) issued Proposed Penalty Assessment Nos. 000140610 and 000157473, respectively, to Petra for several citations. On September 5, 2008, the Commission received from Petra a letter requesting that the cases be reopened so that the operator could contest and discuss the amounts of the penalties. The operator states that the date to contest the penalties had passed because it “did not know the procedures.”
On September 30, 2008, the Commission received an opposition from the Secretary, in which the Secretary states that the operator made no showing of circumstances that warrant reopening. In addition, as to Docket No. CENT 2008-736-M, the Secretary notes that MSHA notified Petra by letter dated May 14, 2008, that it was delinquent in paying the proposed assessment. She states that Petra fails to explain why it took three months to seek relief once it received the letter advising that it was delinquent in paying the penalties.
We have held that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final section 105(a) orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) under which, for example, a party could be entitled to relief from a final order of the Commission on the basis of inadvertence or mistake. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787.
Having reviewed Petra’s request to reopen and the Secretary’s response thereto, we agree
with the Secretary that Petra has failed to provide a sufficiently detailed explanation for its failure
to timely contest the proposed penalty assessments. Petra’s conclusory statement that it failed to
timely contest because it did “not know the procedures,” and its failure to explain the delay in
responding to the delinquency notice in Docket No. CENT 2008-736-M do not provide the
Commission with an adequate basis to reopen. Accordingly, we deny without prejudice Petra’s
request. See, e.g., BRS Inc., 30 FMSHRC 626, 628 (July 2008); Eastern Associated Coal, LLC,
30 FMSHRC 392, 394 (May 2008). The words “without prejudice” mean Petra may submit
another request to reopen the case so that it can contest the citations and penalty assessments.
____________________________________
Michael F. Duffy, Chairman
____________________________________
Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner
____________________________________
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
____________________________________
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
Distribution:
Raul Villa
Petra Materials
1600 E. Fourth Ave.
El Paso, TX 79901
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Myra James, Chief
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021