FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001


April 4, 2008

 

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),

v.

LITTLE BUCK COAL COMPANY
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. PENN 2008-132
A.C. No. 36-08299-130703

Docket No. PENN 2008-142
A.C. No. 36-08299-123747



BEFORE: Duffy, Chairman; Jordan and Young, Commissioners


ORDER


BY THE COMMISSION:


            This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2000) (“Mine Act”). On December 28, 2007, the Commission received from Little Buck Coal Company (“Little Buck”) a motion made by counsel to reopen two penalty assessments that had become final orders of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a). Footnote


            Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).


            On May 23, 2007, the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) issued six citations and orders to Little Buck. The operator subsequently filed timely contests of each citation and order, and those contests are pending in Docket Nos. PENN 2007-267-R through PENN 2007-272-R. MSHA later issued Proposed Assessment No. 000123747, which proposed a penalty for one of the citations, and Proposed Assessment No. 000130703, which proposed penalties for the other five citations and orders.


            Little Buck states that it believed it had forwarded the proposed assessments to the outside counsel representing it in the related contest proceedings. When that counsel learned from opposing counsel in the contest proceedings that neither of the proposed assessments had been contested within the applicable 30-day periods, she alerted Little Buck of its failure to forward the assessments. The Secretary states that she does not oppose Little Buck’s request to reopen the proposed penalty assessments.


            We have held that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final section 105(a) orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which, for example, a party could be entitled to relief from a final order of the Commission on the basis of inadvertence or mistake. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).


            Having reviewed Little Buck’s motion, in the interests of justice, we remand this matter to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for a determination of whether good cause exists for Little Buck’s failure to timely contest the penalty proposals and whether relief from the final orders should be granted. If it is determined that such relief is appropriate, this case shall proceed pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.




                                                                                    ____________________________________

                                                                                    Michael F. Duffy, Chairman


 


                                                                                    ____________________________________

                                                                                    Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner




                                                                                    ____________________________________

                                                                                    Michael G. Young, Commissioner


 

 




Distribution:


Diana R. Schroeher, Esq.

Law Office of Adele L. Abrams, P.C.

 4740 Corridor Place, Suite D

Beltsville, MD 20705


W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220

Arlington, VA 22209-2296


Myra James, Chief

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance

MSHA, U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor

Arlington, VA 22209-3939


Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001-2021