FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW

SUITE 9500

WASHINGTON, DC 20001

August 15, 2007

 

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)


v.

INDEPENDENCE COAL COMPANY

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:



Docket No. WEVA 2007-582
A.C. No. 46-07273-93168

BEFORE: Duffy, Chairman; Jordan and Young, Commissioners


ORDER


BY THE COMMISSION:


            This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2000) (“Mine Act”). On June 25, 2007, the Commission received from Independence Coal Company (“Independence”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).


            Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).


            On or about July 11, 2006, the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) issued to Independence proposed penalty assessment No. 93168, which covered approximately 80 citations or orders. Independence paid the penalties for most of the citations and orders by a check dated July 27, 2006. In its motion, Independence alleges that it had intended to contest the proposed penalty assessments for Order/Citation Nos. 7233011, 7246280, 7246281 and 7245680, and that its safety director had faxed the assessment form to counsel who were handling civil penalty matters. Independence asserts that, due to problems with the fax transmission, the assessment form was not received by counsel and the contests of the four proposed penalty assessments were not submitted. Independence further alleges that it learned of this inadvertence in February 2007, when its safety director received an invoice from


MSHA indicating that an outstanding balance was due on the four violations. In response, the Secretary states that she does not oppose reopening the proposed penalty assessment.


            We have held that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final section 105(a) orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which, for example, a party could be entitled to relief from a final order of the Commission on the basis of inadvertence or mistake. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).

 

            Having reviewed Independence’s request, in the interests of justice, we remand this matter to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for a determination of whether good cause exists for Independence’s failure to timely contest the penalty proposal and whether relief from the final order should be granted. If it is determined that such relief is appropriate, this case shall proceed pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.






                                                                                    ____________________________________

                                                                                    Michael F. Duffy, Chairman

 




                                                                                    ____________________________________

                                                                                    Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner


 



                                                                                    ____________________________________

                                                                                    Michael G. Young, Commissioner




 


Distribution


Carol Ann Marunich, Esq.

Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP

215 Don Knotts Blvd., Suite 310

Morgantown, WV 26501


W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220

Arlington, VA 22209-2296


Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001-2021